Media Briefings

Unequal Societies Provide An Opening For Racist Policies Based On Minority Views

  • Published Date: October 2009


Ideological positions such as racism, which are held by a minority of the voters in a
democracy, may prevail when society is divided over economic issues, such as the
desirability of income redistribution. Racist policies are more likely to emerge the more the
income distribution is polarised. These are the conclusions of research by Vincent Anesi
and Philippe De Donder, published in the October 2009 issue of the Economic Journal.
The researchers note that a naive view of democracy would suggest that only policies
supported by a majority of voters may be implemented in democracies. Casual observation
suggests that this is not the case. For example, although opinion surveys indicate that a
minority of voters in Europe hold racist views, policies and parties with racist overtones
have recently emerged in several European countries.
Anesi and De Donder claim that the naive view of democracy misses two crucial
ingredients of the electoral system:
 First, political parties matter – and a complete theory of democratic decisions
should encompass both the formation of parties and how they choose their political
platforms.
 Second, those platforms contain many different elements and concern several
policy dimensions. Voters then choose policy bundles, and are not able to pick apart
these bundles to select the elements they support and oppose those with which they
disagree.
The study shows that when those two ingredients are introduced, democratic elections may
result in the adoption of ideological policies supported by a minority of voters. Hence,
democratic policies – that is, policies selected by elections – may be racist even though a
minority of voters hold racist views.
The researchers analyse a situation in which political candidates choose which parties they
wish to form and then propose policies along two dimensions: an economic component
(redistributive taxation) and an ideological one (racism). Voters differ in their attitude
towards income redistribution (a majority is in favour while a minority opposes it) and
towards racism (a majority of people hold non-racist views).
Previous research on political economy has shown that a two-dimensional electoral model
represents very well the electoral process in western democracies. Moreover, the economic
and ideological dimensions are precisely the two dimensions that play the most important
role.
This new study shows that if parties did not exist, the policy chosen by a majority of voters
would exhibit no racism at all: simple majority rules. But as soon as there is party formation,
racist policies may be selected by the electoral process.
An even more striking result emerges for societies in which the income distribution is highly
polarised. Then, the only policies that prevail are racist policies, and the degree of racism of
implemented policies increases with the proportion of poor voters (those who support
redistribution) in the electorate.
The basic intuition for these results is that income polarisation divides the non-racist voters,
thus causing the formation of parties in which racist politicians have strong bargaining
power in the choice of electoral platforms.
The bargaining power of the poor and racist politicians inside parties also increases with
the proportion of poor people, leading to a higher level of racism.
ENDS
Notes for editors: ‘Party Formation and Minority Ideological Positions’ by Vincent Anesi
and Philippe De Donder is published in the October 2009 issue of the Economic Journal.
For further information: contact Vincent Anesi on 0115 846 6156 (email:
vincent.anesi@nottingham.ac.uk); Philippe De Donder via email: dedonder@cict.fr; or
Romesh Vaitilingam on 07768-661095 (email: romesh@vaitilingam.com).